Juan Carlos I of infanticide
Statement
Conservative Club in Lodz
Polish Official Group and Organization
Don Juan Carlos de Borbón y Borbón-Dos Sicilias, zwący and called the "crowned" atheistic democracy, "John Charles first" as the constitutional head of State, signed a March 5 (dated 3 March) by the Socialist government pushed through a new abortion law, more than ever the possibility of extending the killing of unborn babies in the womb of their mothers. That decision
D. Juan Carlos (who did not even try to face the resistance of the criminal law, although Spain's constitution does not expressly impose on him the obligation to sign any legislation passed by parliament), specifically "crowned" a series of betrayals committed by the time when - after the death of Gen. Francisco Franco - in his will was proclaimed King of Spain by the Cortes. Let us recall briefly the most important:
- violation of an oath of allegiance (filed as appointed to take over power the Prince of Spain) The organic laws of the Catholic state and the Principles of the National Movement, by agreeing to Transition toward a parliamentary monarchy and signing atheist Constitution of 1978;
- signing the law introducing divorce;
- the signing of the first abortion law;
- signing a law introducing the "marriage" between the sexual deviants;
- signature education law in making the school caves perversion.
Despite all the vices opposed to the holy Catholic faith, morality, natural law and the common good of peoples of Spain, the current Constitutional Head of State still uses, among the titles available to traditional rulers of Spain, the title of King Catholic ( El Rey Catolico ). In fact, he defiles the throne of Spain, and negates the true heritage of the Catholic kings, as Rekared, Pelayo, Alfonso VII, Ferdinand III, Alfonso X the Wise, Isabella the Catholic, Charles I and Philip II. His repeated acquiescence to evil openly disregards the warning largest Christian tradition of monarchical authority, Doctor of the Church of St. Thomas Aquinas: "Let, therefore, to understand by those who accepted the royal ministry that was in the realm of what the body and the soul and God in the world", and "that his state is to be guided by God's kingdom in the name of the court" (De regno , 13.4). This
and who is not guided by God's law and justice and should no longer be called "king", only a "tyrant." Kings (reges ) because - as he wrote to Saint. Isidore of Seville - "get their name from the good conduct ( agendo recta), so the name of the kings have the right to render, and are not entitled to sinners" ( sententiae, Fr. III, xlviii, 7), while a tyrant - he says Aquinas - is like a beast, "because it is no different from the beast the man who guided them in accordance with reason, but according to the wanton will of his soul "(De regno , 4.12).
from former tyrants, such as the murderer of the Innocents Herod or Nero, modern tyrants, like John Charles infanticide, only one difference: the tyranny of those who have held the real power stemmed from arrogance, tyranny "painted kings" in a democracy comes from their cowardice . The driving force behind the wickedness, which condone is the fear that the ruling on behalf of the "sovereign people" oligarchy partiokratyczna not deprived them of the remnants of this purely symbolic and representational functions of which they have been graciously allowed.
We can not and does not express the astonishment of the Episcopal Conference of Spain's position, which - through their spokesman General Secretary, Bishop Juan Antonio Martínez Camino - rushed to ensure that D. Juan Carlos, in contrast to politicians voting in parliament for the abortion law is not excommunicated , as the kings are not subject to the same moral evaluations. Needless to say clearly that the view which has Martínez JE Bishop, it is not Christian, but throughout the pagan concept of "god-king" standing that the "beyond good and evil." In fact, the opposite is true: the kings are not only that, like all other mortals, the same moral standards and the same rules of canon law, but even assume greater responsibility by virtue of their dignity. "Who was responsible for more, since more will be required" (St. Isidore, sententiae, Fr. III, L, 5); already Scriptures. says: "waiting Strengths strong punishment" (Wis 6, 6). By signing the bill dozwalającą killing the innocent, the potential subjects, the Constitutional Head of State undoubtedly gave the excommunication latae sententiae and the adoption by him (and give him) the Holy Communion. would be a terrible sacrilege and scandal.
In the dynastic right now, "the legitimacy of origin" ( legitimidad de origen ) of D. Juan Carlos I to the throne was not the strongest, his enthronement he owed more voluntarism General Franco and his tragic mistake that will not designate a liberal. Now, after the above-mentioned embezzlement within the powinnościom King Catholic Church, in particular the participation of the latter the crime of infanticide in the legislative process should be obvious that he has no moral right to the throne in order, "the legitimacy of the exercise (ejercicio de legitimidad ). The only hope for Spain would be the focus of all the righteous Spaniards at the same Prince, who not only is the depository of monarchical legitimacy and the Guardian of Tradition ( Abanderado de la Tradición ), but his entire life, constantly proves that Prince is a true Catholic, who is certainly not promulgowałby dzieciobójczej Act - D. Sixto Enrique de Borbón y Borbón-Busset, Prince Aranjuezu, infancia Spain Community Regencia traditionalist.
¡Abajo del Usurpadora, Juan Carlos!
¡Viva el Rey Legítimo, Sixto Enrique!
Conservative Club president in Lodz
Assoc. Jacek Bartyzel
President of the Polish Official Group
Adrian
Nickel Classifieds - Classifieds, 6 March AD 2010
Editors' Counter-Revolution, "found that - due to the remarkable accuracy of this text - it should be (on the Rights of the exception) posted on the website of the magazine.
0 comments:
Post a Comment